ABSTRACT
Introduction: Intensive care outcomes in patients with cirrhosis are relatively poor. The comparison between outcomes, especially related to infections, remains unclear in those with and without cirrhosis. With the emergence of resistant and fungal organisms, the changes in infection profiles over time are important to analyze. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of cirrhosis and infections on inpatient death over time in a qSOFA-matched cohort of patients with and without cirrhosis. Method(s): Inpatients admitted to ICUs throughout 2015-2021 were analyzed. Patients with cirrhosis were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and admission qSOFA to patients without;COVID-positive patients were excluded. Admission demographics, labs, the reasons for ICU transfer, infections, and inpatient death or hospice referral were obtained for each patient. Comparisons were made between patients with and without cirrhosis and those who died/referred to hospice versus not. Logistic regression for death/hospice was performed. In patients with cirrhosis, the culture results were compared over the years. Result(s): 1669 patients;833 cirrhosis and 836 non-cirrhosis patients were included. Patients with cirrhosis had higher rates of infection, positive culture, abdominal infection, and bacteremia. They also had higher gram-positive and fungal infections with a higher rate of VRE. They showed a greater organ failure load, death, and hospice referral compared to patients without cirrhosis. Logistic regression showed that cirrhosis (OR 4.0, p< 0.0001), admission qSOFA (1.60, p< 0.0001), WBC (1.02, p=0.003), reasons for ICU (altered mental status 1.69, hypotension 1.79, renal support 2.77, respiratory failure 1.79, CVA 1.96, all p< 0.0001) with Infection (1.77, p< 0.0001, >1 microbe isolated 1.86, p=0.05) were risk factors for death/hospice. The infection trend in the cirrhosis group showed a significant decrease in positive cultures and gram-negative infections and an increase in fungal and gram-positive infections over time. Conclusion(s): Despite matching for demographics and qSOFA, patients with cirrhosis had higher risks of death and organ failures. They were more likely to develop gram-positive and fungal infections with multiple organisms and VRE. Time trends in cirrhosis showed lower rates of positive cultures and gram-negative infections and an increase in fungal and gram-positive infections over time, which should encourage re-evaluation of diagnostic and prophylactic strategies in cirrhosis-related infections. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: It is important to know the risk factors for death in reducing mortality in patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. The purpose of this study was to examine the risk factors associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with S. maltophilia infections. Material(s) and Method(s): Patients with S. maltophilia infections aged 18 years and older who were hospitalized in Haseki Research and Training between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2022, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups, non-survivors and survivors, and the clinical features and laboratory parameters of the groups were compared. Mortality risk factors were analyzed by logistic and Cox regression analyses. Result(s): A total of 75 patients with S. maltophilia infections were included. The mortality rate was 38.6% (n= 29). Advanced age (OR= 1.05, 95% CI= 1.012-1.085, p= 0.009), COVID-19 pneumonia (OR= 9.52, 95% CI= 1.255-72.223, p= 0.029), and presence of central venous catheter (CVC) (OR= 18.25, 95% CI= 2.187-152.323, p= 0.007) were risk factors for death. Conclusion(s): Physicians should be aware of the potential risk of S. maltophilia infections for mortality, particularly in patients with predefined risk factors such as advanced age, the presence of CVC, and COVID-19. Performing CVC care in accordance with infection prevention and control measures and timely removal of CVC may be beneficial in reducing deaths due to S. maltophilia infection.Copyright © 2023 Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: Only between 1% and 10% of patients labelled of penicillin allergy are allergic. The negative events associated with this condition include risk of antimicrobial treatment failure, antimicrobial resistance, side-effects from use of a broader spectrum antibiotic, and increased healthcare costs. Our objective was to know the clinical profile of hospitalized allergic patients to estimate the future need for an allergy study. Method(s): We collected data from 15 Spanish hospitals about hospitalized patients labelled as allergic to antibiotics in February 2020 and October 2020 (one-month sample) outside the peak of the Covid-19 pandemic. Result(s): 620 patients were collected, 59% women. Mean age 70.6 years (3-103). 416 patients were labelled as allergic to beta-lactams (105 aminopenicillins, 18 cephalosporins, 4 carbapenems). 41 to aminoglycosides, 26 to macrolides, 55 to quinolones and 4 to glycopeptides. The causes of hospitalization were: Respiratory infection 221 (35.6%), abdominal infection 95 (15.3%), orthopaedic surgery 58 (9.4%), urine infections 57 (9.2%), skin infections 51 (8.2%), gynaecological/ obstetric pathology 21 (3.4%) Only 163 patients (26%) had previously received a clinical allergy work-up. 70 confirmed allergy to antibiotics, however the rest 93 (74%) were not delabelled. Patients received alone or combined alternative antibiotics: 79 glycopeptides, 49 aminoglycosides, 28 macrolides, 254 quinolones, 205 beta-lactams (102 cephalosporins, 41 carbapenems and 57 aminopenicillins). 74 patients (12%) would need an immediate allergic study in order to receive first-line antibiotic, but it was only really done in 38 (6.1%). The studied antibiotics were: 15 carbapenems, 10 ceftriaxone, and others not specified. Of the 416 patients labeled as allergic to beta-lactams, 150 (36%) received beta-lactam antibiotics despite the warning in their clinical reports. Conclusion(s): Allergy to beta-lactams remains the most frequent diagnosis of allergy to antibiotics and implies treatment with second-line antibiotics. Respiratory, trauma, digestive and urinary infections are the main causes of the use of antibiotics in hospitalized patients. The underlying diseases could be a risk factor for antibiotic requirements. Some patients received beta-Lactams despite the alert with a potential risk of an allergic reaction and legal implications. The promptly allergological study would imply an improvement in the use of more specific antibiotics with a good level of security.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime-avibactam has proven activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in clinical trials and real-world studies. This study was conducted to describe the patterns of use of ceftazidime-avibactam (including indications and associated antibiotics), and the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This non-interventional medical chart review study was conducted in 11 countries across the European and Latin American (LATAM) regions. Consecutive patients treated in clinical practice with at least one dose of ceftazidime-avibactam for an approved indication per country label since 01 January 2018 (or launch date in the country if posterior) were enrolled. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 h. RESULTS: Of the 569 eligible patients enrolled, 516 (90.7%) were treated for at least 72 h (354 patients from Europe and 162 patients from LATAM); 390 patients (75.7%) had switched from another antibiotic line for Gram-negative coverage. Infection sources were intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory, bloodstream infections, and other infections (approximately 20% each). K. pneumoniae was the most common microorganism identified in the latest microbiological evaluation before starting ceftazidime-avibactam (59.3%). Two-thirds of microorganisms tested for susceptibility were MDR, of which 89.3% were carbapenem-resistant. The common MDR mechanisms for K. pneumoniae were carbapenemase (33.9%), oxacillinase 48 (25.2%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (21.5%), or metallo-beta-lactamase (14.2%) production. Without prior patient exposure, 17 isolates (mostly K. pneumoniae) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Treatment success was achieved in 77.3% of patients overall (88.3% among patients with urinary infection), regardless of first or second treatment line. In-hospital mortality rate was 23.1%. Adverse events were reported for six of the 569 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: This study provides important real-world evidence on treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice through its recruitment in the European and LATAM regions. Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the antibiotics to consider for treatment of MDR bacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03923426.
ABSTRACT
Background. Antimicrobial treatment at the end of life is common. However, there is limited evidence on whether antimicrobial use during hospice care provides symptom palliation or contributes to discomfort. We sought to further investigate antimicrobial use at the transition toCMO in immunocompromised patients with active malignancies. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with active malignancies over 18 years of age admitted to Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 3/1/2018 to 3/1/2021, who were transitioned to CMO. From hospital databases and from subsequent chart review, we examined: receipt of antimicrobials at any point in the admission;indication for antimicrobials;timing of CMO order;underlying hematologic/ oncologic diagnosis;and concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis. Among the patients who received antimicrobials, we identified patients on antibiotics 48 hours prior to and after CMO order placement. Patients were excluded if CMO orders were reversed. Results. 384 patients met study criteria. The mean age was 67 years, and 50.5% patients were female. 31.8% of patients carried a hematologic malignancy diagnosis while the remaining had solid tumor diagnoses. 88% patients received antimicrobials at any point during their hospitalization. Of the patients who received antimicrobials during their admission, 84% received them in the 48 hours prior to transition to CMO and 15.3% continued receiving antimicrobials after CMO transition. Patients received a mean of 5.7 antibiotics. Most common indications for antimicrobials included pneumonia (22.2%), intra-abdominal infections (13.6%), sepsis (13.3%), and prophylaxis (3.5%), but most (39.8%) received antimicrobials for more than one infection or indication. Conclusion. Hospitalized patients with active malignancy at the end of life are heavily exposed to antimicrobials. The majority of patients transitioned to CMO receive antimicrobials during their last hospital admission, and a significant subset (15.3%) continue antimicrobials after placement on CMO. Further studies are needed to investigate the potential benefits and harms of continuing antimicrobials in CMO patients, as decisions are complex and individualized.
ABSTRACT
Background: ICU outcomes, especially related to infections, remains unclear in those with and without cirrhosis. With the emergence of resistant and fungal organisms, the changes in infection profiles over time is important to analyze. Method(s): Inpatients admitted to ICUs throughout 2015-2021 were analyzed. Cirrhosis was diagnosed using clinical and radiological features and were matched 1:1 by age, gender, and admission qSOFA to non-cirrhotic patients;COVID positive patients were excluded. Admission demographics and labs, hospital course were obtained for each patient. Comparisons were made between patients with and without cirrhosis and those who died/hospice versus not. Result(s): 1669 patients;833 cirrhosis and 836 non-cirrhosis patients were included, of which 456 (27%) died or were referred to hospice. Cirrhosis versus not comparison: Patients with cirrhosis had a higher rate of infection, positive cultures, abdominal infections, and bacteremia. They also had higher gram-positive and fungal infections with higher rate of VRE. Admission WBC, demographics, altered mental status, nosocomial or second infections or LOS were similar between cirrhosis/not groups.Death and hospice versus not comparison: 74% of patients who died had cirrhosis vs 41% of those who survived. Conversely, 41% out of 1213 patients who survived had cirrhosis (p<0.0001). People who died were more likely to have nosocomial infections, higher UTIs, bacteremia and respiratory infection and those with positive cultures, >1 organisms, VRE and MRSA isolation. Patients who died had higher LOS and all organ failures. On Logistic regression for death/hospice, cirrhosis (OR 4.0, p<0.0001), admission qSOFA (1.60, p<0.0001) and WBC (1.02, p=0.003), reasons for ICU (altered mental status 1.69, hypotension 1.79, renal support 2.77, respiratory failure 1.79 & CVA 1.96, all p<0.0001) with Infection (1.77, p<0.0001, >1 microbe isolated 1.86, p=0.05) were risk factors while skin and soft-tissue infections had a lower risk of death/hospice (0.39, p=0.02). Time trend in cirrhosis for infections: There was a significant decrease over time with positive culture and gram-negative infections and increase in fungal and gram-positive infections. Conclusion(s): Despite matching for demographics and qSOFA, patients with cirrhosis had a higher risk of death and organ failures, and were more likely to develop infections due to gram-positive and fungal infections with > 1 organisms and VRE, compared to those without cirrhosis. Patients who died were more likely to have cirrhosis, infections and higher qSOFA compared to those who survived. Time trends in cirrhosis showed lower rate of positive cultures and gram-negative infections and increase in fungal and gram-positive infections over time, which should encourage re-evaluation of diagnostic and prophylactic strategies in cirrhosis-related infections. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: COVID-19 Co-Infections SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 1:45 pm INTRODUCTION: We present a case of Eggerthella bacteremia in a patient with COVID-19. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old woman presented to the emergency room with chief complaint of cough, dyspnea, and malaise. After testing positive with a home COVID-19 test three days earlier, she continued to have worsening respiratory status and was brought in via ambulance. She was found to be tachycardic and hypoxic, requiring high-flow oxygen to maintain saturation in the emergency department. Chest X-ray showed bilateral patchy opacities consistent with multifocal COVID-19 pneumonia, and she was admitted to the intensive care unit for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. COVID-19 drug therapy was initiated, including baricitinib, remdesivir and decadron. Shortly after hospitalization, she began to endorse worsening abdominal pain. Physical exam elicited tenderness to palpation of her right lower quadrant. Abdominal CT scan showed distal ileum fluid collection concerning for possible bowel perforation. She underwent exploratory laparotomy which confirmed perforation, and a small bowel resection with anastomosis was performed. Blood cultures were positive for gram-positive bacilli, which were further identified as Eggerthella species. She required mechanical ventilation for worsening respiratory function post-surgery but remained unresponsive on the ventilator. The patient was administered vancomycin but continued to decline and eventually expired. DISCUSSION: Eggerthella is an anaerobic, gram-positive bacilli present in the gut microflora. Eggerthella infection has most often been reported in intra-abdominal infections. However, cases of bacteremia infection remain sparse. Most infections have been associated with other gastrointestinal processes including Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, appendicitis, and diverticulitis abscesses. Our case involved a patient with no significant gastrointestinal history admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia infection on baricitinib complicated by bowel perforation and bacteremia. Bowel perforation is a known risk factor of baricitinib use, and these risks should be discussed with the patient before beginning therapy. Overall mortality for Eggerthella species infection remains high, with some estimates as high as 31%. Much remains unknown about the impact on gut microbiome by SARS-CoV-2, however, early research suggests a higher rate of fungal co-infection in patients with COVID-19. As the literature on COVID-19 expands, more and more unusual pathogens such as Eggerthella may be found to contribute to the morbidity and mortality of patients being treated for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Unusual pathogens such as Eggerthella may complicate a patient's hospital course while undergoing treatment for COVID-19. Reference #1: Alejandra Ugarte-Torres, Mark R Gillrie, Thomas P Griener, Deirdre L Church, Eggerthella lenta Bloodstream Infections Are Associated With Increased Mortality Following Empiric Piperacillin-Tazobactam (TZP) Monotherapy: A Population-based Cohort Study, Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 67, Issue 2, 15 July 2018. Reference #2: Gardiner BJ, Tai AY, Kotsanas D, et al. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of Eggerthella lenta bacteremia. J Clin Microbiol. 2015. Reference #3: Lau SK, Woo PC, Fung AM, Chan K-M, Woo GK, Yuen K-Y. Anaerobic, non-sporulating, gram-positive bacilli bacteraemia characterized by 16s rrna gene sequencing. Journal of medical microbiology. 2004. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Kristin Davis No relevant relationships by Charles Peng
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Management of COVID-19-Induced Complications SESSION TYPE: Rapid Fire Case Reports PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 1:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Multiple pleural complications have been well described during COVID-19 infection including pneumothorax, pleural effusion and empyema. While many infections have been described as complications, here we present a case of empyema secondary to Enterococcus faecium in a patient with COVID-19 after Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). CASE PRESENTATION: A 33-year-old male presented with acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19. He was intubated 10 days after symptom onset and subsequently placed on veno-venous ECMO, with reconfiguration to add an arterial return limb and eventually pulmonary artery return limb. During his care he was treated with remdesivir, dexamethasone and tocilizumab. His course was complicated by right heart failure requiring mechanical support, acute renal failure requiring hemodialysis, superior vena cava thrombus, multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella and methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infections. Eventually he was removed from ECMO on day 130. The patient remained in the ICU on positive pressure ventilation via tracheostomy. He eventually developed worsening respiratory status as well as signs concerning for an emerging infection. Broad spectrum antibiotics were initiated, and a CT chest/abdomen/pelvis was obtained that showed right pleural effusion with concern for empyema. Pleural sampling was consistent with empyema with glucose <5 mg/dL, pH <7.2, lactate dehydrogenase >200 U/L and an elevated neutrophil count. A percutaneously placed 14 french chest tube was placed and pleural irrigation with normal saline was trialed given patient need for continuous systemic anticoagulation. However, this did not sufficiently resolve the empyema and patient was started on pleural TPA/Dornase with close monitoring while on anticoagulation with clinicoradiographic improvement after a total of 6 days of therapy. Cultures eventually speciated as Enterococcus faecium and he was continued on a 6 week course of ampicillin for his empyema. DISCUSSION: Classically, Enterococcus empyema has been primarily linked with intra-abdominal infections which was not found in our patient and has not been correlated with COVID-19 infection or ECMO. Additionally, there is a significant paucity of data with regards to safety of TPA/Dornase pleural irrigation use while patients are on full dose systemic anticoagulation as was our patient. In this case he required two 3-day courses of TPA/Dornase which was tolerated well without significant complication. CONCLUSIONS: Here we describe a rare causative organism of empyema that has not been previously described in the literature as associated with COVID-19 or ECMO. Additionally, we demonstrate the safety of intra-pleural TPA/Dornase in this patient on full dose anticoagulation which is a frequent consideration when determining the method of treating empyema in complex medical patients. Reference #1: Ayad S, Gergis K, Elkattawy S, et al. Loculated empyema and SARS-COV-2 infection: A report of two cases and review of the literature. European journal of case reports in internal medicine. July 2021;8(7):002706. doi:10.12890/2021_002706. Reference #2: Bergman R, Tjan DH, Schouten MA, Haas LE, van Zanten AR. Pleural Enterococcus faecalis empyema: an unusual case. Infection. Feb 2009;37(1):56-9. doi:10.1007/s15010-007-6359-6 Reference #3: Rahman NM, Al. E, Author Affiliations From the United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit and Oxford Pleural Diseases Unit, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection: Nejm. New England Journal of Medicine. Nov 2011;365:518-526. doi:10.1056NEJMoa1012740. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Joshua Boster No relevant relationships by Mary Gadarowski No relevant relationships by Stephen Goertzen No relevant relationships by Amanda Hall No relevant relat onships by Erik Manninen
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the availability and access to the hospital for the patients with intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) by Escherichia coli (E. coli) as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the impact of these changes in the diagnosis and their effects on the death of these patients. Methods: Two prospective observational cohorts of the patients with IAI by E. coli were conducted in 2016 (the pre-COVID-19, n = 108) and in 2020 (during the COVID-19, n = 96) at the University Hospital of Seville, Spain. The demographic and clinical variables of the patients were collected and analyzed. The patients were followed-up for 120 days, until the hospital discharge or death. The bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Both the cohorts were homogeneous according to age, sex, emergency surgery cause, immunosuppression, neutropenia, acquisition type, and previous intervention. The patients attended during the COVID-19 had significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index and the more McCabe score, required more emergency surgery, had more severe infections with the higher rates of septic shock and sepsis, and the presence of additional care support such as a nasogastric tube. They were diagnosed later; the time intervals between the symptoms onset (SO) to the first medical contact or surgical intervention (SI) and between the first medical contact to the admission or SI were significantly higher. The death rates during the COVID-19 and the pre-COVID-19 were 16.7 and 6.5%, respectively (p = 0.02). Finally, the multivariate analysis in both the cohorts together identified the patients diagnosed during the COVID-19, the longer period from SO to SI, septic shock, and the Charlson comorbidity index as the independent factors associated with death. Conclusion: This study showed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical outcome and death due to IAI with an extension of the time between SO and SI.
ABSTRACT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime-avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-ß-lactam ß-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime-avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime-avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator ß-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane-tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime-avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime-avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime-avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Relapse after complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) remains common after treatment. The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for cIAIs is uncertain, especially in cases where source control is not achieved. We hypothesised that in patients with cIAIs, regardless of source control intervention, there would be a lower relapse rate with long-course antibiotics (28 days) compared with short course (≤ 10 days). We piloted a trial comparing ≤ 10-day with 28-day antibiotic treatment for cIAI. METHODS: A randomised controlled unblinded feasibility trial was conducted. Eligible participants were adult patients with a cIAI that were diagnosed ≤ 6 days prior to screening. Randomisation was to long-course (28 days) or short-course (≤10 days) antibiotic therapy. Choice of antibiotics was determined by the clinical team. Participants were followed up for 90 days. Primary outcomes were willingness of participants to be randomised and feasibility of trial procedures. RESULTS: In total, 172 patients were screened, 84/172 (48.8%) were eligible, and 31/84 (36.9%) were randomised. Patients were assigned to either the short-course arm (18/31, 58.0%) or the long-course arm (13/31, 41.9%). One patient in the short-course arm withdrew after randomisation. In the short-course arm, 4/17 (23.5%) were treated for a cIAI relapse vs 0/13 (0.0%) relapses in the long-course arm. Protocol violations included deviations from protocol-assigned antibiotic duration and interruptions to antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This feasibility study identified opportunities to increase recruitment in a full trial. This study demonstrates completion of a randomised controlled trial to further evaluate if the optimum antibiotic duration for cIAIs is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03265834.